Dr. Gleb Tsipursky – The Office Whisperer
Nirit Cohen – WorkFutures
Angela Howard – Culture Expert
Drew Jones – Design & Innovation
Jonathan Price – CRE & Flex Expert
More stories for you
In a significant development for federal workers, the Biden administration has secured protections for hybrid work arrangements at the Social Security Administration (SSA), securing telework options for tens of thousands of employees until 2029.Â
This agreement, made between the SSA and the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), impacts around 42,000 SSA workers and aims to maintain current telework levels, allowing staff to continue working remotely for a portion of the week, according to Bloomberg.Â
The deal, finalized by SSA Commissioner Martin O’Malley, ensures that workers will not be required to return to the office full-time, with in-office days varying between two to five per week depending on the role.Â
This move is seen as an effort to improve job retention and prevent higher employee turnover, ensuring the agency’s ability to serve the public effectively.
The new agreement comes as part of a wider effort from unions to secure favorable labor contracts before the incoming Trump administration takes office in January.Â
Unions are advocating for the extension of existing collective bargaining agreements, fearing potential changes to federal work policies under President-elect Trump, including cuts to the federal workforce and restrictions on telework.Â
Trump’s transition team, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, has proposed significant government streamlining — including bringing federal employees back to the office full-time, which they argue would reduce staffing costs and inefficiencies.
The situation highlights a potential clash between the current administration’s labor-friendly policies and the incoming leadership’s goals to reform government operations.Â
Although Trump’s team has indicated an intention to challenge existing labor agreements, legal experts note that the government is bound by its contractual obligations, and breaking such agreements could lead to legal challenges and backlash from unions and lawmakers.
