A potential move to release U.S. jobs data quarterly instead of monthly is raising concern across the commercial real estate (CRE) sector, where employment trends are closely tied to leasing decisions, underwriting, and investor confidence. The monthly report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is a key indicator many in the industry rely on to assess market conditions and economic momentum.
The change was suggested by E.J. Antoni, President Trump’s nominee to head the BLS, following the dismissal of former commissioner Erika McEntarfer on August 1.
Antoni, a Heritage Foundation economist, argued that quarterly reports would reduce the need for revisions and improve data reliability, according to BisNow. His comments, made before his official nomination, do not reflect current BLS policy, according to the White House.
A Trusted Data Source in CRE at Risk
For years, monthly jobs data has served as a foundational tool for real estate professionals. Brokers use the data to adjust leasing strategies, concessions, and pricing on a month-to-month basis, particularly in high-turnover sectors like hospitality. Employment trends also help gauge future demand in different regions and sectors.
Reducing the frequency of that information would inject more uncertainty into an already cautious CRE environment. With deal activity slowed and many markets still recovering from pandemic-era disruptions, timely labor data remains essential for decision-making.
Alternative Data Exists, But Can’t Fully Replace BLS
While larger institutional investors already tap into alternate data — from sources like ADP, LinkedIn, and mobility analytics firms such as Placer.ai and Advan Research — many CRE professionals still depend on the consistent, standardized approach of BLS reports. Transitioning away from monthly data would require a major shift in research and modeling methods.
Experts warn that no single alternative source can fully replicate the comprehensiveness or credibility of the BLS. Smaller market players, in particular, would struggle to fill the gap, as they often lack access to expensive private data tools.
Experts Call for Better Reporting, Not Less
Industry economists acknowledge that monthly BLS data is occasionally revised, but say that’s to be expected when tracking such a massive and dynamic labor force. Rather than cutting back, many argue that improving the BLS’ methodology and funding would reduce errors while preserving transparency.
The U.S. is known globally for its access to timely economic data, which boosts investor confidence and market stability. Reducing the frequency of the jobs report could undermine that advantage — especially in volatile times, when short-term labor shifts have long-term implications.
While no formal policy has been announced, and most believe the monthly reports will continue in some form, the mere suggestion of change is enough to worry CRE stakeholders who depend on clarity and consistency to act.
