Dr. Gleb Tsipursky – The Office Whisperer
Nirit Cohen – WorkFutures
Angela Howard – Culture Expert
Drew Jones – Design & Innovation
Jonathan Price – CRE & Flex Expert
Recent studies related to the pros and cons of return-to-office (RTO) policies reveal that the in-office vs. remote work debate is not slowing down in 2024.
One survey, published by Resume Builder, polled 833 business leaders and found that a majority (63%) believe RTO has improved productivity. Nearly 60% even reported employees working more when they are in the office than when they are remote — only 28% say the opposite, and 13% stated that they don’t believe there’s any difference.
Aside from perceived productivity gains, business leaders in the survey also reported that the following aspects had improved since issuing an RTO policy: communication (65%), engagement (61%), mental health (53%), morale (52%) and burnout (26%). However, these benefits get muddled when looking at other related studies on the topic.
One study conducted by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh reports entirely different results from RTO-mandates. Analyzing data from 137 S&P 500 companies, the study suggests that companies with RTO mandates often had previously weak stock performance — and that these mandates did little to improve the company’s financial situation. Additionally, the study found a concerning decline in employee job satisfaction following an RTO implementation.
Ultimately, the key in the data seems to lie in understanding individual needs and creating a work environment that prioritizes both performance and employee well-being.
Perhaps flexibility and clear expectations, as suggested by Resume and Career Strategist Julia Toothacre in Resume Builder’s report, is the winning combination for organizations moving forward. Additionally, focusing on factors beyond a physical office presence — such as stronger accountability and fostering a positive work culture — might prove more effective than simply mandating in-office hours.
