A U.S. appeals court nullified an order today that had barred Amazon from firing union supporters during a nationwide warehouse union organizing campaign.
This decision by a three-judge panel from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan argued that the lower court judge didn’t justify why such a broad order was needed, according to Reuters.
The original 2020 case involved Amazon firing Gerald Bryson, a Staten Island warehouse worker and union organizer, for using profane language towards a coworker during a protest over COVID-19 safety measures.
This particular warehouse, called JFK8, became Amazon’s first unionized facility in 2022. However, other Amazon locations in New York and Alabama have since voted against unionizing.
U.S. District Judge Diane Gujarati had initially ruled that Bryson’s firing violated labor laws, but didn’t find sufficient evidence that it prevented other workers from unionizing, thus she didn’t order his reinstatement. The appeals court agreed, stating the sweeping mandate to protect other union supporters was unnecessary without evidence of a broader impact.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had been pursuing an injunction against Amazon while an administrative case regarding Bryson’s firing proceeded. Amazon claims the termination was due to Bryson’s behavior during the protest, where he made offensive remarks towards a female coworker, not because of union activities.
Despite the administrative judge’s order to reinstate Bryson in 2022, Amazon appealed, and the case was remanded to apply a new legal standard for misconduct in organizing rights. The judge again ruled against Amazon in January.
This ruling could potentially set an example and embolden other companies to dismiss pro-union employees, expecting minimal repercussions, as a push for unionization proliferates globally.
