Dr. Gleb Tsipursky – The Office Whisperer
Nirit Cohen – WorkFutures
Angela Howard – Culture Expert
Drew Jones – Design & Innovation
Jonathan Price – CRE & Flex Expert
More stories for you
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 20 that a retired Florida firefighter cannot pursue a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) over changes to her post-employment healthcare benefits. In an 8–1 decision, the Court found that Karyn Stanley lacked legal standing because she was no longer a current or prospective employee at the time of the alleged discrimination, according to HR Brew.
Stanley, who retired in 2018 due to complications from Parkinson’s disease, had sued the city of Sanford, Florida, claiming that changes made to its retiree health benefits in 2003 unfairly disadvantaged workers who retired early because of disability. Before the policy change, employees like Stanley were eligible for extended health coverage. After the update, only those with 25 years of service retained long-term access.
The Court upheld lower court rulings, which concluded Stanley was not a “qualified individual” under Title I of the ADA, a key requirement to bring such a claim. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, emphasized that ADA protections related to employment apply only to those actively holding or seeking a job at the time of the alleged discrimination.
Employment attorneys noted that while ADA protections don’t extend to retirees, benefits programs still fall under other civil rights laws like Title VII, meaning employers must continue to ensure non-discriminatory practices in designing and adjusting such plans.
Legal experts say the decision may give employers more clarity — and some relief — when modifying retiree benefits, although caution remains essential due to other potential legal risks.
