Dr. Gleb Tsipursky – The Office Whisperer
Nirit Cohen – WorkFutures
Angela Howard – Culture Expert
Drew Jones – Design & Innovation
Jonathan Price – CRE & Flex Expert
More stories for you
There’s a growing narrative that bosses are demanding employees return to the office full-time, but recent data paints a more nuanced picture.
Over the past six months, the percentage of remote-capable U.S. workers in hybrid roles has slipped slightly from 55% to 51%, according to Gallup. At the same time, both fully remote and fully on-site work have inched up by two percentage points each. This subtle reshuffling suggests there’s no overwhelming surge back to office life, despite the high-profile companies making those demands.
Since 2022, work location patterns have remained largely steady, indicating that hybrid work has become a stable arrangement for many organizations. Gallup’s latest data reveals only minor changes in how employees split their time between home and office, with hybrid workers spending just under half their week on-site (about 2.3 days), up slightly from previous years — but that increase has plateaued recently.
Industry Differences Tell a Bigger Story
Half of the American workforce can do their jobs remotely, yet how they work varies by industry. In tech, for example, nearly half of employees work fully remotely, while a similar share maintains hybrid schedules. Only a small fraction are fully on-site, and this balance has stayed consistent for several years.
Federal government employees tell a different story. Following policy changes after the 2025 presidential transition, remote and hybrid work for federal workers sharply declined. The share of federal employees in hybrid roles dropped from over 60% to less than 30%, while those fully on-site doubled to nearly half the workforce — far above the national average.
Who’s Deciding the Hybrid Schedule?
Control over hybrid schedules is another evolving aspect. Fewer employees now report having full autonomy over their schedules, with more employers and teams stepping in to set the rules. Hybrid work schedules are now fairly evenly split among employee-driven, manager- or team-driven, and employer-driven decisions.
Interestingly, when teams collectively decide work schedules, employees tend to view those policies as fairer than when schedules are determined by leadership alone. Yet, giving employees full control over their schedules often leads to challenges such as higher burnout, worse work-life balance, and difficulties meeting customer expectations.
This highlights the value of team-based agreements in making hybrid work both productive and sustainable.
Building Trust in a Hybrid World
Trust remains a critical issue in hybrid environments. Just over half of managers say they fully trust their remote teams, and a similar proportion of employees feel trusted. Gallup research identifies four key factors that boost trust: clear, consistent communication; a strong team community; accountability for performance; and equal access to feedback and development, regardless of location.
Organizations that prioritize these areas are more likely to harness the benefits of hybrid work, improving productivity and employee satisfaction.
In conclusion, while media coverage often focuses on the “return to office” debate, most companies have settled into a balanced hybrid approach that continues to evolve. Except in specific sectors like the federal government, fully on-site work remains rare, and hybrid schedules are increasingly defined by collaboration and trust.
