Dr. Gleb Tsipursky – The Office Whisperer
Nirit Cohen – WorkFutures
Angela Howard – Culture Expert
Drew Jones – Design & Innovation
Jonathan Price – CRE & Flex Expert
As companies bring employees back on site, the commute is taking hours out of the day again. A new MyPerfectResume analysis frames those trips as lost personal and productive time workers once kept for themselves.
The report describes this as an “invisible pay cut” — not an actual reduction in salary, but a way to estimate the economic value of commuting time.
The Scale of the Time Tradeoff
Across the U.S., the average worker spends 223 hours per year commuting, roughly equivalent to nearly six full workweeks.
Using the national average hourly wage of $36.53, that time equates to about $8,158 annually in lost time value.
The impact varies widely by location:
- Highest time value loss: San Jose, San Francisco, and New York each exceed $12,000 per year
- Longest commute: New York City averages a 36-minute one-way trip, about 300 hours annually
- Lower-cost metros: Cities such as Grand Rapids, Memphis, and Oklahoma City average around $5,000 in time value
Researchers note that lower-cost cities often compensate with limited transit options, creating different — but still significant — burdens.
Why Return-to-Office Changes the Equation
Remote and hybrid work previously eliminated or reduced commuting hours for millions of workers. The renewed shift toward office attendance effectively extends the workday without changing pay.
The analysis frames commuting as part of total compensation: time required to perform a job but not directly paid.
This helps explain why some workers perceive office mandates as more than a location change — they alter daily schedules, autonomy, and personal time allocation.
Uneven Effects Across Cities and Workers
High-wage metropolitan areas produce the largest dollar-value losses because time is priced higher.
Lower-wage regions may show smaller financial estimates but can still involve long travel times and fewer transportation choices.
In both cases, the burden falls on time rather than direct expenses, which the study does not include (fuel, transit fares, parking).
Measuring the “Invisible Pay Cut”
The estimate combines federal commute data from the U.S. Census Bureau with wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Researchers calculated annual commuting hours using average one-way travel times across 250 workdays, then multiplied those hours by local average wages. The result ranks the 50 largest U.S. metro areas by time value lost.
The authors emphasize the figure is conceptual — a way to visualize opportunity cost rather than money deducted from paychecks.
A Growing Workplace Tension: Flexibility Versus Presence
During the remote-work era, employees regained hours previously spent traveling. As organizations bring workers back on-site, those hours return to the work routine — even though they remain unpaid.
For employers designing workplace policies and employees evaluating job quality, the study suggests commuting is no longer just a logistical detail. It has become a measurable component of how work is experienced and valued.
